home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT2109>
- <title>
- Sep. 21, 1992: Getting Down To Business
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Sep. 21, 1992 Hollywood & Politics
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- THE WEEK
- NATION, Page 14
- Getting Down To Business
- </hdr><body>
- <p>At last the race is focusing in on an issue voters care about:
- the economy
- </p>
- <p> Finally, there has been a sign that the 1992 presidential
- campaign will find relevance after all. Between the Republican
- Convention and Labor Day, the traditional start of the general
- election contest, odds of that happening seemed slight. George
- Bush and his minions seemed fixated on "family values," Bill
- Clinton's draft record and a deceptive numbers game over tax
- increases in Arkansas. The Democrats sounded on the verge of
- declaring class warfare--trying to scare the elderly, veterans
- and students with unfounded charges that Bush would savage
- programs on which they depend. But suddenly last Thursday, Bush
- jerked attention away from all that and onto the issue many
- Americans suspected he had been doing almost anything to avoid:
- the nation's economic future. Overnight, the President had moved
- toward a clarification of the choice between his approach and
- that of his rival.
- </p>
- <p> In a speech to the Economic Club of Detroit, Bush
- presented an "Agenda for American Renewal" with more
- cohesiveness than he had shown heretofore. Then he aired
- prime-time commercials on all the networks to offer voters
- copies of his program--a technique Clinton has been using with
- success since last winter in New Hampshire.
- </p>
- <p> The core of Bush's pitch was hardly surprising. Sounding
- like a born-again preacher of Reaganomics, the President
- promised to "stimulate entrepreneurial capitalism, not punish
- it." He argued for lower taxes, less federal spending, less
- regulation. To make America an "export superpower," Bush
- proposed an expansive network of free-trade arrangements going
- well beyond the North American Free Trade Agreement now pending.
- For the Beltway bureaucracy bashers, he offered to cut the
- salaries of higher-paid government officials and to pare the
- White House operating budget by one-third--if Congress does
- the same.
- </p>
- <p> Clinton quickly rebutted, alternately dismissing Bush's
- proposals as a compilation of old ideas at one campaign stop,
- then demanding at the next to know why it had taken the
- President so long to offer them. On the latter point, to be
- sure, Bush is vulnerable. But by bringing his proposals
- together, relating them to each other and treating the subject
- seriously, Bush at last faced the reality that the economy is
- this year's predominant issue. Bush committed himself to
- free-market solutions with minimal direction from Washington.
- Clinton, for all the neo-liberal filigree on his rhetoric, would
- increase federal intervention and spending in a variety of ways.
- </p>
- <p> With less than 50 days until the election, these
- distinctions are beginning to solidify. Clinton's plan to
- provide universal health insurance would involve
- government-imposed cost control as well as higher taxes. Bush's
- approach centers on making private insurance more affordable for
- individuals. Clinton wants an elaborate new national service
- program as a means of giving young people a way of repaying
- college loans. Bush promises to scale down the federal
- bureaucracy.
- </p>
- <p> If a presidential campaign is supposed to offer large
- options, it is also supposed to provide something of an
- education to voters. Here Bush's performances are still lacking.
- Like Clinton, he has yet to offer a detailed and realistic plan
- to cut the federal deficit. But if last week's bracing change
- is an indication, voters may yet find their choice for President
- based on issues that actually matter to them.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-